Geological data analysis and 3D modelling for early-stage mineral projects

Interactive maps, 3D models and analysis of your project, yours to keep

Built from your data and the public record, and analysed to show what no single source can: which ground stands out, how far each result can be trusted and what to do next. Every file opens in a browser.

Discuss your project See the services

Hills banded in orange, red and pale green rock under a grey sky

Intro

How it works

Three steps take a project from scattered files and public records to new information about the ground, and to the decision it supports.

Integrate

Drillholes, structural measurements, geophysics, geochemistry, mapping and topography: what you hold, plus what we find in public sources, checked and merged into one georeferenced database.

Analyse and model

We analyse the combined data to produce information that none of the sources holds alone: anomalies measured against the local geology, estimates with a stated margin of error, 3D models and ranked targets. Where the data allows, each result is tested against values held back from the analysis.

Decide and show

The result answers the question you came with: which ground to stake, whether old assays can be trusted, where to sample or drill, what a zone could hold. It comes as browser-based maps and models that you own and can put in front of anyone.

Scoped to your question, your budget and what the data can honestly support.

Services

From scattered data to a decision

Three stages, nine services. Take one or all of them: each is scoped to your question, your data and your budget.

Stories

Work we have done

Real engagements, anonymised. Each one says what the result can support and what it cannot.

Gold project · Argentine Puna

A district on one map, before the field season

Public geophysics, geology, stream-sediment geochemistry and neighbouring titles within 20 km of a project, combined into one browser map and used to place the next sampling points.

Regional geochemistry · Argentine Puna

Can fifty-year-old assays be trusted?

About 3,500 legacy stream-sediment samples, a third of them re-assayed with modern methods. We tested, metal by metal, whether the old values improve the map. For copper they do; for lead and zinc they do not.

Guides

Guides to exploration data

Plain explanations of the methods and terms behind our work: what they can support, and where they stop.

What is a gossan?

The rusty cap left when sulphide minerals weather at surface: how it forms, how to read it, and why not every gossan sits above ore.

Prospectivity mapping explained

How geology, geochemistry and geophysics are combined into a ranking of ground, which methods suit sparse data, and what the map cannot tell you.

Can you use legacy assay data?

Old assays are cheap and plentiful, but methods and locations differ from modern data. How to test whether they can be used, and when to leave them out.

Contact

Discuss your project

Tell us what data you have and what you need to decide.

Write to us directly

Thomas Houweling
Latin America and Europe, remote

We use what you send only to reply to you. See the privacy notice.